I want to reach people with my music – common people. (Sym Info 1987) and Never again a serial-production-group (Sym Info 1986): Difference between pages

From Allan Holdsworth Information Center
(Difference between pages)
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''Summary''': Allan Holdsworth, the acclaimed guitarist, reflects on his desire to reach a wider, non-specialized audience with his music. He shares his satisfaction with the SynthAxe, an instrument he's come to master, and how it complements his guitar playing. Despite facing frustration in the music industry, Holdsworth's commitment to his unique sound remains strong. He discusses the inspiration behind his album "Atavachron," referencing an episode of Star Trek, and his creative process for composing music.''
'''''Summary''': Allan Holdsworth, a highly regarded guitarist, is known for his exceptional talent, with accolades from artists like Gary Moore and Eddie Van Halen. He's had a varied career, working with bands like Soft Machine, Gong, and UK, each transition occurring somewhat accidentally. He expresses a desire to avoid serial-production bands. Holdsworth recently explored the SynthAxe, a revolutionary instrument, which he believes offers vast possibilities for musicians. He emphasizes that the success of such innovations depends on the artist's creative use rather than the technology itself.'' ''[This summary was written by ChatGPT in 2023 based on the article text below.]''
 
Interview of Allan Holdsworth by Sym Info (May 1986)


Interview of Allan Holdsworth by Sym Info (October 1987)
Sym Info was a Dutch progressive rock magazine  
Sym Info was a Dutch progressive rock magazine  
Interview by WILLEBRORD ELSING
Interview by WILLEBRORD ELSING
Translation from Dutch by René Yedema
Translation from Dutch by René Yedema


“I want to reach people with my music – common people.”
ALLAN HOLDSWORTH: Never again a serial-production-group.
 
An interview about little accidents, electronics and the art of baking chips.
 
The name Allan Holdsworth won’t mean anything to much people, but he is considered as one of the most leading guitarists. People like Gary Moore and Eddy Van Halen called him a shining example, and his frightening fast play yield him superlatives like “God’s greatest gift to the guitar since Jimi Hendrix”. Different from many of his racing colleagues though Holdsworth makes compositions that do have head and tail.
 
On February 19th 1986 he performed in Paradiso (Amsterdam), at which he showed during a soberly decorated concert that he can fulfil his virtuosity on stage. An unexpected big amount of people - about 600 – were present at the concert. Probably this anyhow is due to an impressive career; he played with amongst others Soft Machine, Gong, Jean-Luc Ponty, Bill Bruford and UK.
On his own he made with his group IOU under his own supervision an eponymous LP (1982, in 1985 re-released by the Enigma label), and under his own name “Metal Fatigue” (1985, Enigma) and recently for the same label “Atavachron”, on which he uses for the first time the SynthAxe, a revolutionary, new instrument, about which later more.
 
So, quite a lot of different groups, and his own accompanying band changes constantly from cast too. Is Holdsworth so difficult to work with?
 
“When it comes to my own band, that’s how it has been from the beginning. Because we don’t earn that much money it’s hard to keep the same band together. And sometimes some thing goes wrong, and then we say “We won’t be on tour now, but only after 10 months.”
 
Other musicians have to provide in their living. Than they get offered something, and they take it, logical, they have to. Then you come into a situation in which you have to search for someone else, although that hasn’t been necessary until now. I’ve been lucky, all musicians just came to me like that.
 
And when it comes to all those bands I’ve been playing in, those were all just accidents. I never did that on purpose, I never began to play in a band with the idea to search for something else as soon as possible, I always thought I would stay in that band for ever. Soft Machine was the only band I left on my own accord, because I wanted to play with Tony Williams. Not that I didn’t love Soft Machine, for me it was an interesting band to play in. At that moment I got the chance to play with Tony and I thought that I would continue doing that for the time being. But the reason I left him was because the management was so bad. At a certain moment it was even that bad that during a tour pianist Alan Pasqua and myself were stranded in San Francisco and there was nobody, no hotel, no airline tickets, nothing! But I loved it to play in that band, it was fantastic.
 
So that was an accident, and after that Gong; that stopped existing as the band fell apart, so that wasn’t my fault. And than Jean-Luc Ponty; even before I started playing with him I had agreed with Bill (Bruford) that I would co-operate on his solo-project, so after I had finished with Jean-Luc I had to go again to work with Bill.


Holdsworth isn’t very happy with himself tonight. After a show in Paradiso (Amsterdam) on June 15th 1987, a kind of double-concert with Stanley Clarke, he walks in the catacombs with a face that is even larger than it’s already from nature. He isn’t satisfied with his play. Undeserved, but as we will discover in the interview, the real reason lies much deeper.
Then came U.K., which came about because some girl had recommended me to the other boys from U.K. Bill and I got fired from U.K., so that was it. Why? I have no idea, really not… why do you dismiss somebody? After that Bill started his own band. The record-company probably found it safer to go further with the other two guys in the band, who were adjusted quite commercially, than with two typical jazz-people like Bill and me.


Together with drummer Chad – and bassist Bob Wackerman Holdsworth gave a performance from one hour which was creditable. Very varied, and with a lot of space for soloing by the diverse musicians, without ever threatening to become freaky. On guitar Holdsworth was in a better shape than ever and played a couple of solo’s that are amongst the fastest I’ve ever heard, in which he didn’t lose his sense of melody not even for a moment. The man stays a phenomenon. The other instrument handled by Holdsworth was the SynthAxe.
Still UK seemed to me the band with the status that fitted with your talent, like Gong was the band with the talent that fitted with your talent. They both seemed to fit with you very much.


For those who are still unfamiliar with this instrument: the SynthAxe is a just a couple of years old string-instrument, which looks somehow like a guitar with a neck in a somewhat strange hook on the body, and which is being used to control a synthesizer. The last time the SynthAxe was for Holdsworth clearly an instrument for some variation of his guitar-play, now the proportions were almost even.
“I don’t believe UK fitted with me totally. I didn’t like it to play the music live; they played every night the same thing, and I didn’t like that. I became very depressed, was already drunk before I had to come on the stage, no, I didn’t have much fun with that.
Gong had a whole lot of potential, especially the two vibes-players, Benoit and Pierre (Moerlen). A very interesting group, and it was sad that they didn’t stay with each other. It was politics, and also the fact that they came from different countries (England and France).


Holdsworth:
Still there were people like Mike Oldfield and Nick Mason involved with the band.
“I think that at this moment I’m capable to play the SynthAxe a whole lot better. On the last LP, “Atavachron”, I just got it before we started recording and I had to play and try to fathom the instrument at the same moment, which didn’t make things easier. On my new LP, “Sand”, I almost play just SynthAxe.


Aren’t you afraid that the Synthaxe is, commercially seen, doomed to die; you’re the only one who’s positive about the instrument?
“Yes, but I had never heard of them before I started playing with them. There was someone from Virgin, their manager at that moment, who put me into contact with them because they were looking for a guitarist. And that was all, at that moment I didn’t know anything about those flying teapots (laughs sour).”


“Maybe that’s because I never wanted to play guitar. I just see it as an instrument, for me it’s something great; I can’t say enough positive things about it. I can understand why people aren’t so satisfied with it generally; guitarist simply have the tendency to be rather ‘close-minded’ on that point. They want to do everything with it which they also can do on a guitar and don’t think about the possibilities this instrument offers which aren’t possible on a guitar. It works to two sides. I’m very enthusiastic about what they did with the instrument, the shape, the angle of the neck, that sort of things. The only critic which I would have on the instrument is the neck; to my opinion it should be smaller. But that’s the only thing I would want to chance.
Are there still some groups in which you’d love to play?
It’s quite good possible that the instrument is doomed to die, just like all the things that are ahead of its time. On the other hand you could get a whole new generation of SynthAxe-players who never had a guitar in their hands. It’s just an incredible invention.”


The story goes that you had to sell your house so you could buy the SynthAxe.
“Like?”


“That’s not quite true. Some eight years ago I had bought a house, or actually a flat, in England. At one moment we moved to the States, where I rented a house, because I didn’t know if I would like it there. Meanwhile we leased out the flat in England. What happened was that the guy who moved into our flat didn’t pay the rent. With the music I make I may be happy if I can be able to support myself, so two houses at the same moment I couldn’t pay. So I sold the house in England, which I thought was terrible, because I wanted to have something to return to if I wouldn’t like it in the States. I’d rather not see my wife and children on the street. But anyway, I got more for that flat than I paid for it when I bought it, and the difference I used to be able to buy the SynthAxe.”
Yes?


You’re a shining example for a lot of famous guitarists. Bill Bruford told me a month or so ago that if he would play the guitar, he would have wanted to play like you, which is somehow the most beautiful compliment one can get. Aren’t you afraid that you’re investing 10.000’s of dollars in an instrument which will in the end alienate you from your own audience?
“No, thank you. I don’t want to come into that corner again by playing with that kind of serial-products-groups.


“Yes, but I don’t care for it. I’m not interested in guitar-players, I don’t want to play for guitar-players, I don’t like it to play for guitar-players. I want to make music, become a better musician. The instrument isn’t important. I listen to music, to tones. When I hear Michael Brecker play the saxophone, I’m not only hearing the saxophone, but also the music, the ideas, ‘the mind in the man’. The same when I hear Keath Jarrett play the piano. I’ve never wanted to play piano, it’s in some way a percussive instrument, and I don’t like percussive instruments. I love wind-instruments, like an oboe, or English horn, which is about my favourite sound. I want to reach people with my music, common people. And when I don’t play guitar anymore in the future, maybe I get a bigger audience, or not any at all, but that doesn’t interest me.”
Do I sense an UK-trauma?


But there’s also a practical argument like to be able to make ends meet.
“Yes… it’s always such a trouble with that kind of bands: they create an image that they can’t fulfil by sounding great on the album and never to able to put that onto the stage. I don’t know… oh yes, there is somebody with whom I would love to play! Sting, that seems fantastic to me! But otherwise, no.


“That’s for me the only criterion, to earn at least that much money so my wife and children have something to eat. I would want do some other work, and than make music in my free time. Rather maybe, because guitarists want to hear me play the guitar, and I don’t care about that. I play guitar when I want to. I would rather work for SynthAxe, or Oberheim, or whoever and then make the music I want to make myself.
That music has, just like yours, quite some common ground with jazz.


Everything is beginning to frustrate me bit by bit. It seems as if it isn’t going to work. The last year I’ve been thinking to go and do something else, another way of earning my bread; ‘it’s just not happening’. It takes too long, and I don’t see it happening ever.”
“That’s true, although that doesn’t mean automatically that it’s good. A whole lot of people just love one kind of music – take for instance those people who only love jazz. I think that’s ridiculous, because a lot of jazz is awful, terrible and simply bad. The same way a whole lot of pop-music makes me mad, it’s disgusting! On the other hand, some pop-music is good, Sting for instance.”


What would you want to see happening than?
An inevitable subject in the conversation is the SynthAxe. Without wanting to fall into a too technical story, here follows in short the working of this new music-instrument.
One can image the SynthAxe as a kind of guitar. An essential outward difference is the neck which stands in an ergonomic sensible way in an angle on the so called body of the instrument. On this instruments there are two sets of strings: on set on the neck, to play with, or better: to indicate the pitch, and one set on the body, where the strings are being touched.


“Well, the usual thing, that more people hear my music and can say yes, I like it or no, I don’t like it at all. I don’t expect that much people will like it, because it’s no easy music to listen to. On the other hand I think there are enough people who would love my music if they got the chance to hear it, but they will never be able to hear it because of the media, because of the record-companies, because of the radio. They control the situation, and that isn’t just harmful for me, but for so much other music. Radio-stations are the worst, they seem to assume that people are stupid, and they aren’t.
With a guitar the pitch of a produced sound is being determined by the place where the string is being pressed on the so called fret. With the SynthAxe this isn’t the case; the electronics that are present in the instrument registers the place where the string makes contact with the fret and deduces the pitch from that; the tone on which the string has been tuned has been programmed in advance. This produces a couple of advantages: the musician doesn’t have to put strength in order to play, never has to tune and change the strings until they fall apart from the instrument. Further on the SynthAxe offers a couple of possibilities to influence the sound, the pitch and the time to hold a certain tone (sustain). The SynthAxe differs essential from the guitar in working, because it doesn’t produce sound from itself; everything that being played, is being transformed in digital information which is being fed to a synthesizer which is being connected to the instrument. So, virtually this story amounts on the fact that you can play synthesizer on a guitar-like instrument in stead of on a keyboard, which has been customary since the introduction of the synthesizer. It all seems quite simple, but still, a collective of three wise guys have been busy for no less than eight years to develop the SyntAxe!
People would love to hear different kinds of music, if only they would get the chance. Of course there would be enough music which they wouldn’t like, but than they would at least have the chance to decide themselves. If I would have never have eaten an orange I couldn’t have known if I would like it either. I wouldn’t know what I could do about it to chance it, at least that aspect. I think about it to stop with it completely.
To play on the SynthAxe asks a different attitude from the musician, because he thinks he has a guitar in his hands and hears the sound of a synthesizer, which still is again completely different than normally because on a guitar the arrangement of the tones that form together a chord just is different than on a keyboard. A guitar furthermore lets itself play essentially different, so the synthesizer producers quite different sounds and changes than you are used to hear.


Are you serious?
Well, last year Holdsworth saw a prototype from the SynthAxe on a fair, nosed a bit on it and one hour after his introduction with the instrument showed a complete elaborated composition, which made even the developers of the machine fell backwards with astonishment. And Holdsworth went home with a SynthAxe, a firm pat on the back and the request to keep in touch soon.
Was he the first one that was allowed to play on it?


“Yes; because I can’t keep doing what I do now. I’m forty now and I can’t keep running against the wall for ever; it’s just not worth it. I don’t like this life, to be away from my family for ages, the trouble my fellow musicians have to go through to be able to play the music they like. It’s not worth it.”
“I think so, yes. I just didn’t master to play the instrument totally. The amount of possibilities is incredible. And furthermore they are still busy with changing and adding without chancing something on the outside. In fact it’s just a computer which transforms information to a synthesizer.”


Lets talk about something more pleasant and go back to your last LP but one, “Atavachron”. Recently I saw a replay of one of the episodes of Star Trek in which on a certain moment some kind of alien says to Spock, pointing to a machine: 'This, mr. Spock, is the Atavachron'
Doesn’t this development hold a certain danger in itself? Take for instance the Fairlight; when that one came on the market everybody talked about a musical revolution, but now it proves that it is only being used to make weird sounds.


"I love that episode, the idea of a machine with which the population of that planet goes back to its own history to escape the destruction of that planet. In any case I'm a Star Trek-fan. I also love that word: 'Atava' from "Atavistic' and 'Chron' form 'Chronological'. 'All Our Yesterdays' was the title of that episode, and I've used it for one of the tracks, a reflective piece of music. I try to visualize music; mostly it's a word or a happening and that gives me inspiration for a piece of music. On my new LP there's a song '4:15 Bradford Exect'. I was born in Bradford an often took the train from London to visit my family. In this song I've tried to play a guitarsolo from seven minutes without one repetition, just like the constant changing landscape out of a driving train. With "Atavachron" it was something familiar. In the late evening I often sit in the studio. And than, with all the lights out, the only thing that gives some light are the little lamps of the mixing consule. Than it's not hard at all to imagine you're in a spaceship."
“Whatever new things come onto the market, on a certain moment you will see that they are being misused for one thing or another. I don’t believe that that is so important; at least someone will do something good with it, it doesn’t matter what, as long as the striving only is the making of music. It totally depends on the musician. The same thing with electronics. In fact it’s just like cooking. My mother could bake incredible chips, but at home I couldn’t get it done myself. Then she came to visit us once, and made them exactly the same way: in our kitchen, with our gear. That’s all I’m saying: it depends on the person, not on the machine.


[[Category:Press]]
[[Category:Press]]

Revision as of 13:47, 28 October 2023

Summary: Allan Holdsworth, a highly regarded guitarist, is known for his exceptional talent, with accolades from artists like Gary Moore and Eddie Van Halen. He's had a varied career, working with bands like Soft Machine, Gong, and UK, each transition occurring somewhat accidentally. He expresses a desire to avoid serial-production bands. Holdsworth recently explored the SynthAxe, a revolutionary instrument, which he believes offers vast possibilities for musicians. He emphasizes that the success of such innovations depends on the artist's creative use rather than the technology itself. [This summary was written by ChatGPT in 2023 based on the article text below.]

Interview of Allan Holdsworth by Sym Info (May 1986)

Sym Info was a Dutch progressive rock magazine Interview by WILLEBRORD ELSING Translation from Dutch by René Yedema

ALLAN HOLDSWORTH: Never again a serial-production-group.

An interview about little accidents, electronics and the art of baking chips.

The name Allan Holdsworth won’t mean anything to much people, but he is considered as one of the most leading guitarists. People like Gary Moore and Eddy Van Halen called him a shining example, and his frightening fast play yield him superlatives like “God’s greatest gift to the guitar since Jimi Hendrix”. Different from many of his racing colleagues though Holdsworth makes compositions that do have head and tail.

On February 19th 1986 he performed in Paradiso (Amsterdam), at which he showed during a soberly decorated concert that he can fulfil his virtuosity on stage. An unexpected big amount of people - about 600 – were present at the concert. Probably this anyhow is due to an impressive career; he played with amongst others Soft Machine, Gong, Jean-Luc Ponty, Bill Bruford and UK. On his own he made with his group IOU under his own supervision an eponymous LP (1982, in 1985 re-released by the Enigma label), and under his own name “Metal Fatigue” (1985, Enigma) and recently for the same label “Atavachron”, on which he uses for the first time the SynthAxe, a revolutionary, new instrument, about which later more.

So, quite a lot of different groups, and his own accompanying band changes constantly from cast too. Is Holdsworth so difficult to work with?

“When it comes to my own band, that’s how it has been from the beginning. Because we don’t earn that much money it’s hard to keep the same band together. And sometimes some thing goes wrong, and then we say “We won’t be on tour now, but only after 10 months.”

Other musicians have to provide in their living. Than they get offered something, and they take it, logical, they have to. Then you come into a situation in which you have to search for someone else, although that hasn’t been necessary until now. I’ve been lucky, all musicians just came to me like that.

And when it comes to all those bands I’ve been playing in, those were all just accidents. I never did that on purpose, I never began to play in a band with the idea to search for something else as soon as possible, I always thought I would stay in that band for ever. Soft Machine was the only band I left on my own accord, because I wanted to play with Tony Williams. Not that I didn’t love Soft Machine, for me it was an interesting band to play in. At that moment I got the chance to play with Tony and I thought that I would continue doing that for the time being. But the reason I left him was because the management was so bad. At a certain moment it was even that bad that during a tour pianist Alan Pasqua and myself were stranded in San Francisco and there was nobody, no hotel, no airline tickets, nothing! But I loved it to play in that band, it was fantastic.

So that was an accident, and after that Gong; that stopped existing as the band fell apart, so that wasn’t my fault. And than Jean-Luc Ponty; even before I started playing with him I had agreed with Bill (Bruford) that I would co-operate on his solo-project, so after I had finished with Jean-Luc I had to go again to work with Bill.

Then came U.K., which came about because some girl had recommended me to the other boys from U.K. Bill and I got fired from U.K., so that was it. Why? I have no idea, really not… why do you dismiss somebody? After that Bill started his own band. The record-company probably found it safer to go further with the other two guys in the band, who were adjusted quite commercially, than with two typical jazz-people like Bill and me.”

Still UK seemed to me the band with the status that fitted with your talent, like Gong was the band with the talent that fitted with your talent. They both seemed to fit with you very much.

“I don’t believe UK fitted with me totally. I didn’t like it to play the music live; they played every night the same thing, and I didn’t like that. I became very depressed, was already drunk before I had to come on the stage, no, I didn’t have much fun with that. Gong had a whole lot of potential, especially the two vibes-players, Benoit and Pierre (Moerlen). A very interesting group, and it was sad that they didn’t stay with each other. It was politics, and also the fact that they came from different countries (England and France).”

Still there were people like Mike Oldfield and Nick Mason involved with the band.

“Yes, but I had never heard of them before I started playing with them. There was someone from Virgin, their manager at that moment, who put me into contact with them because they were looking for a guitarist. And that was all, at that moment I didn’t know anything about those flying teapots (laughs sour).”

Are there still some groups in which you’d love to play?

“Like?”

Yes?

“No, thank you. I don’t want to come into that corner again by playing with that kind of serial-products-groups.”

Do I sense an UK-trauma?

“Yes… it’s always such a trouble with that kind of bands: they create an image that they can’t fulfil by sounding great on the album and never to able to put that onto the stage. I don’t know… oh yes, there is somebody with whom I would love to play! Sting, that seems fantastic to me! But otherwise, no.”

That music has, just like yours, quite some common ground with jazz.

“That’s true, although that doesn’t mean automatically that it’s good. A whole lot of people just love one kind of music – take for instance those people who only love jazz. I think that’s ridiculous, because a lot of jazz is awful, terrible and simply bad. The same way a whole lot of pop-music makes me mad, it’s disgusting! On the other hand, some pop-music is good, Sting for instance.”

An inevitable subject in the conversation is the SynthAxe. Without wanting to fall into a too technical story, here follows in short the working of this new music-instrument. One can image the SynthAxe as a kind of guitar. An essential outward difference is the neck which stands in an ergonomic sensible way in an angle on the so called body of the instrument. On this instruments there are two sets of strings: on set on the neck, to play with, or better: to indicate the pitch, and one set on the body, where the strings are being touched.

With a guitar the pitch of a produced sound is being determined by the place where the string is being pressed on the so called fret. With the SynthAxe this isn’t the case; the electronics that are present in the instrument registers the place where the string makes contact with the fret and deduces the pitch from that; the tone on which the string has been tuned has been programmed in advance. This produces a couple of advantages: the musician doesn’t have to put strength in order to play, never has to tune and change the strings until they fall apart from the instrument. Further on the SynthAxe offers a couple of possibilities to influence the sound, the pitch and the time to hold a certain tone (sustain). The SynthAxe differs essential from the guitar in working, because it doesn’t produce sound from itself; everything that being played, is being transformed in digital information which is being fed to a synthesizer which is being connected to the instrument. So, virtually this story amounts on the fact that you can play synthesizer on a guitar-like instrument in stead of on a keyboard, which has been customary since the introduction of the synthesizer. It all seems quite simple, but still, a collective of three wise guys have been busy for no less than eight years to develop the SyntAxe! To play on the SynthAxe asks a different attitude from the musician, because he thinks he has a guitar in his hands and hears the sound of a synthesizer, which still is again completely different than normally because on a guitar the arrangement of the tones that form together a chord just is different than on a keyboard. A guitar furthermore lets itself play essentially different, so the synthesizer producers quite different sounds and changes than you are used to hear.

Well, last year Holdsworth saw a prototype from the SynthAxe on a fair, nosed a bit on it and one hour after his introduction with the instrument showed a complete elaborated composition, which made even the developers of the machine fell backwards with astonishment. And Holdsworth went home with a SynthAxe, a firm pat on the back and the request to keep in touch soon. Was he the first one that was allowed to play on it?

“I think so, yes. I just didn’t master to play the instrument totally. The amount of possibilities is incredible. And furthermore they are still busy with changing and adding without chancing something on the outside. In fact it’s just a computer which transforms information to a synthesizer.”

Doesn’t this development hold a certain danger in itself? Take for instance the Fairlight; when that one came on the market everybody talked about a musical revolution, but now it proves that it is only being used to make weird sounds.

“Whatever new things come onto the market, on a certain moment you will see that they are being misused for one thing or another. I don’t believe that that is so important; at least someone will do something good with it, it doesn’t matter what, as long as the striving only is the making of music. It totally depends on the musician. The same thing with electronics. In fact it’s just like cooking. My mother could bake incredible chips, but at home I couldn’t get it done myself. Then she came to visit us once, and made them exactly the same way: in our kitchen, with our gear. That’s all I’m saying: it depends on the person, not on the machine.”